WIPO started eighteen new domain disputes today and published no decisions; 704 cases remain open.
On Wednesday WIPO set eighteen new domain disputes in motion, covering 47 domain names. That is below the recent weekday average of 23.
STICHTING BDO was behind two of them.
The widest case is D2026-5015, one complaint from Guggenheim Capital, LLC. against fifty-one domain names, including guggenheimpartnerinfo.com.
26% of the names sit outside .com, .net, .org, .info and .biz, led by .shop, .co, .one.
Elsewhere, two cases were closed without a ruling and two were paused. WIPO’s list does not say why; a closure before a decision usually means the parties settled or the complaint was withdrawn, and a pause is usually the parties negotiating.
Among the 2,238 most recent WIPO cases tracked here, 704 are active, 193 are filed and waiting on WIPO’s compliance review, and 88 are paused. The longest-running active case, D2026-3306, began 76 days ago.
18 cases, 47 domain names. These cases cleared WIPO’s compliance review and formally began today.
Complaints WIPO received that have not yet been formally started. Most begin within a few days.
WIPO published no decisions today.
WIPO often posts a decision’s full text a few days after the outcome. These are facts read from decisions published in the last ten days, now that the text is available.
WIPO lists these as terminated. That usually means a settlement or a withdrawal; WIPO does not say which.
Suspended cases are on hold, commonly at the parties’ request while they talk. They can resume or end without a ruling.
Of the active cases, 480 began in the last 30 days, 214 between 30 and 59 days ago and 10 more than 60 days ago.
WIPO decided 339 of the cases tracked here in the 30 days to 4 November 2026: 94% ended in a transfer, 5% in a refused complaint, 0% in a cancellation and 1% another way.
Affiliate disclosure: this page contains affiliate links
(Dynadot and Spaceship). I may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through them.
The WIPO links are not affiliate links.
Want the history behind today’s cases?
See how WIPO domain name disputes end, month by month, and read the panel decisions where a complaint
was found to be reverse domain name hijacking. Explore the WIPO domain
dispute archive →
How this page is made
Every figure here comes from WIPO’s own public case lists for generic top-level domains,
read once a day. This page covers WIPO only. Other UDRP providers such as Forum, the Czech Arbitration
Court and the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre run their own cases and are not included.
Launched and decided use the dates WIPO itself records.
Closed, paused and filed are the first day this tracker saw
a case in that state, so they depend on the tracker having looked the day before.
The tracker follows the 2,238 most recent WIPO case numbers; a case older than that is not shown.
Respondents are not named here; the case number links to WIPO’s record.
Disputed names are shown as plain text on purpose. Many are live impersonation sites, so none is linked.
A complaint is an allegation until a panel rules. This is a news summary, not legal advice.
The wording is generated from the data by fixed templates, with no AI model involved,
so it cannot report a case that WIPO does not list.
0 Comments